The Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression (AFTE), filed a lawsuit before the Administrative Court on behalf of Mahmoud Shehata, student at Cairo University, demanding that the Ministry of Interior, represented in the Prison Authority, allow Shehata\u2019s family to provide him with health supplies and hygiene tools such as alcohol disinfectants, masks, and gloves that contribute to the prevention of corona virus infection (Covid-19). The lawsuit also demanded that his family be informed of all information and preventive measures that the Prison Authority and the Ministry of Interior are taking to prevent the spread of Covid-19 virus infection within prisons and to enable Shehata to communicate with his family by any means, instead of the canceled weekly family visits.<\/p>\n
Shehata was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment on charges of assembly and show of force at Cairo University, in case No. 26123 of 2014, Bulaq El Dakrour Felonies, registered with No. 3235 of 2015, south of Giza. He is imprisoned in the high security Minya prison.<\/p>\n
The lawsuit, which numbered 37755 for the year 74 Judicial, was raised against the Prime Minister, the Minister of Interior, and the Head of the Prison Authority,\u00a0in their capacity.<\/p>\n
This lawsuit is part of a campaign launched by AFTE to highlight and improve the conditions of prisoners and detainees pending freedom of expression cases, amidst the spread of Covid -19 virus.<\/p>\n
In the lawsuit, Shehata\u2019s defense committee\u2019s demands were based on three main elements; the first is the law and the constitution, as the latter stated that imprisonment should be in appropriate places, in the humane and health terms. In addition, all that contradicts human dignity or endangers the prisoners’ health is prohibited in prisons. The Prison Regulation Act also provides that:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cEvery convict shall have the right to correspond, and make telephone calls in exchange for a fee, and his family has the right to visit him bimonthly, all under the supervision of the prison administration and in accordance with the rules and procedures established by the internal regulation. A remand prisoner has this right unless a different decision is issued by the competent public prosecutor or the competent investigating judge, in accordance with the procedures established by the internal regulation\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n The second element on which the lawsuit was based is the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, as these rules emphasized that prisoners must enjoy the same level of health care available in society, and should have the right to obtain the necessary health services free of charge and without discrimination based on their legal status.<\/p>\n The lawsuit also referred to the \u201cInterim Guidance\u201d issued by the World Health Organization with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, on March 27, 2020, for governments and countries concerning people deprived of their liberty in light of the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic. The \u201cInterim Guidance\u201d stated that the situation may require, in light of the spread of Covid-19, replacing family visits with other measures, such as video, electronic communications and telephone communications (paid phones or cell phones). It also pointed to the importance of transparency with regard to the preventive measures taken by prisons, as it stated:<\/p>\n \u201cInformation on preventive health measures should be provided to all persons deprived of their liberty in a language and format they understand and that is accessible; and efforts should be made to improve the hygiene and the cleanliness of the detention places. Such measures should be gender, culture, abilities and age sensitive\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n In relation to the mitigating measures, the \u201cInterim Guidance\u201d stated that:<\/p>\n \u201cInformation on mitigating measures provided to persons deprived of their liberty as well as their families should be in languages and formats that are understandable and accessible to all, clear, and accurate. They should explain the measures that the detention center is taking to protect the health of persons deprived of their liberty and the public at large. Any restrictions on rights and freedoms must be consistent with international human rights norms and principles, including legality, proportionality, necessity and non-discrimination\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n The third element on which the lawsuit was based is the abuse of power by the administration \u2013in this case the Prison Authority- which alone took over all the powers, in a complete disregard of all the fundamental rights and freedoms of convicts and remand prisoners. It also did not apply any of the constitutional articles or the legal provisions of the Prison Regulation Act, with regard to the right to communicate with the detainee and the prisoner.<\/p>\n In a related context, AFTE decided to withdraw a case that it had filed last week before the State Council, on behalf of journalist Hassan El-Banna Mubarak, to demand that his family be allowed to provide him with health supplies and hygiene tools such as alcohol disinfectants, masks and gloves. The lawsuit also demanded that El-Banna be enabled to communicate with his family through telephone calls and written messages, in addition to informing his family of all the preventive measures that the prison administration took to prevent the spread of Covid-19 virus infection.<\/p>\n The decision to withdraw the lawsuit is based on a prolonged discussion with El-Banna\u2019s family on the appropriate legal steps to his advantage, as it became evident that the family is inclined to withdraw the lawsuit. The association\u2019s position is consistent with its established principles of prioritizing the desire of the clients and their families.<\/p>\n AFTE confirms it will continue defending journalist Hassan El-Banna by all available legal means.<\/p>\n The association notes that it is continuing to work on the campaign to improve the conditions of detainees pending freedom of expression cases. It also calls on families of detainees to take all legal means, including litigation, in order to improve their conditions.<\/p>\n