Joint Press Statement: Sentencing Activists for 15 years in Absentia Confirms our concerns regarding the right to free and fair trials and the independence of the judiciary
12 June 2014
The harsh sentence handed down today in absentia by the Cairo Criminal Court against Alaa Abdel Fattah, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, WaelMetwally and 22 others is another severe violation of the basic right to a fair trial adding to the dismal human rights situation in Egypt, said the undersigned organizations. The undersigned organizations condemn the sham proceedings, not meeting the most basic standards of fair trial, and believe that the defendants should not have been charged or tried in the first place as they were merely exercising their right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. The undersigned organizations condemn the continual crackdown on any form of dissent and the silencing of the lone voices drawing attention to the government’s abysmal human rights record. Putting one of the faces and symbols of opposition activism, Alaa Abdel Fattah, behind bars appears to be a punitive measure against his continual vocal criticism of the authorities, and aims to serve as a deterrent for others signaling that criticism is no longer tolerated.
Alaa Abdelfattah, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, WaelMetwally and 22 others were convicted of breeching the protest law, illegal gathering, theft, and attacking officials on duty and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment, 100,000 pound fines, and a further five years of police surveillance after their release. The verdict was handed down in abstentia despite the fact that defendants’ lawyers were present from 9:00am in court room held at the Police Academy in Tora Prison. They were awaiting the beginning of the hearing, while some defendants began to arrive shortly after. At about 9:45am, to their surprise, lawyers discovered from court security that the verdict had already been handed down in absentia without any hearing. Some 15 minutes later, Alaa Abdelfattah, Ahmed Abdel Rahman and WaelMetwallywere arrested outside the court.
During the last hearing in this case held on 25 May, the proceedings were postponed until today due to the judge’s alleged illness. Today’s verdict was handed down in proceedings flagrantly breeching the right to fair trial including the right to adequate defense. Defense did not have the chance to call in witnesses, cross examine prosecution witnesses, examine video evidence or plead their case. On the other hand, the prosecution’s case solely rests on police investigations and witnesses, including some five or six police officers carrying out the arrests. Defense plans to call for a “ repeat of procedures” to retry the case. In the meantime, Alaa Abdelfattah, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, and WaelMetwally will remain behind bars. It is worth noting that after the investigations were over, Alaa and Ahmed Abdel Rahman were kept in custody for over 100 days waiting for their referral to the criminal court. We consider this delay an abuse of the law aimed at prolonging their detention. The undersigned organizations are extremely concerned about the manipulation of the law, for the purpose of keeping them in custody for an extended period .
The undersigned human rights organizations express their deep concern about the deeply flawed nature of the trial and the judiciary’s apparent involvement in a political conflict. Today’s verdict is the latest example in the series of unfair trials conducted in Egypt in the past three years, all failing to uphold basic due process rights. The Minyamass trials are other blatant examples of severe breeches to the right to a fair trials. The verdict further demonstrates the selective nature f justice and thus reflects deep problems affecting the judiciary at large ..
The defendants, with the exception of Alaa Abdel Fattah, were arrested on 26 November 2013, when police violently dispersed a peaceful protest in front of the Shura Council in Cairo. Alaa Abdel Fattah was taken from his home two days later. The protest organized by the No to Military Trials group against provisions allowing for the military trials of civilians in the 2014 Constitution came in the wake of a passage of a repressive protest law on 24 November, which essentially bans protests unauthorized by the Ministry of Interior and gives security forces free reign to use excessive force to disperse peaceful protests.
Police broke-up the peaceful protest using excessive force, beating and arresting protesters including women who were punched, dragged and in some cases sexually assaulted. While women and a number of journalists and lawyers were released without charge, 24 men were slapped with charges. Alaa Abdel Fattah was added to the case after the public prosecution issued an arrest warrant. Despite Alaa Abdel Fattah’s declared intention of handing himself to the public prosecution, on 28 November, police forcibly broke into his home hitting him and his wife Manal Bahaa al-Din before whisking him away. Alaa Abdel Fattah and Ahmed Abdel Rahman remained in prison until their release on bail on 23 March.
Thousands of people have been arrested in the context of demonstrations and other political violence, many of them charged or convicted of breeching the protest law since its passage in November 2013, including members and supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood as well as prominent activists and human rights defenders know for their opposition to the Muslim Brotherhood. Among those serving sentences for breeching the repressive protest law is human rights defender Mahinour El Masry sentenced along with seven others to two years in prison on 2 January and fines for protesting without authorization in Alexandria. A higher court upheld the verdict on 20 May. Founder of the 6 April Movement, Ahmed Maher, Mohamed Adel, the movement’s spokesperson, and political activist Ahmed Douma are also currently serving three year sentences for breeching the same protest law after following their conviction b a Cairo court in December.
Today’s verdict is another example of the government’s unrestlessness disregard for Egypt’s constitutional guarantees to uphold freedom of assembly and the right to fair trial, as well as Egypt’s international obligations as a state party to the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights.
- Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights
- Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies
- Andalusinstitute for Tolerance and Anti-Violence Studies
- Appropriate Communications Techniques for Development (ACT)
- Arab Organization for Penal Reform
- Arabic Network for Human Rights Information
- Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression
- Center for Egyptian Women’s Legal Assistance
- Egyptian Center for Economic and Social Rights
- El Nadeem Centre for psychological rehabilitation of victims of violence and torture
- Hisham Mubarak Law Center
- Human Rights Association for the Assistance of Prisoners
- Masryoon Against Religious Discrimination
- National group for human rights and law
- Nazra for Feminist Studies
- New Woman Foundation